GII-US-2020-JUD-SCOTUS-OPINION-0003-v1 · analytic version 1 · methodology v1.1.1 · status beta · all dossiers
Withheld: weighted coverage 50% is below the provisional 70% threshold; counterfactual is compromised.
Magnitude is direction-neutral and never appears without confidence, coverage, and maturity.
The dossier#
Decision summary
Hypothetical Administrative Deference Ruling. GII-US-2020-JUD-SCOTUS-OPINION-0003-v1 · origin JUD-SCOTUS · maturity provisional_observed.
Legal and implementation status
Maturity provisional_observed; implementation verified: yes; counterfactual: compromised.
Institutional lineage
Single-node lineage; no cross-institution extract attached.
Affected populations and entities
Domains in scope: public_entities, private_enterprise. Affected populations are reported with the exact denominator each source uses.
GII scorecard (with uncertainty and maturity)
Observed headline WITHHELD (weighted coverage 50% is below the provisional 70% threshold; counterfactual is compromised). Shown with confidence, coverage, and maturity regardless.
Benefits and burdens by domain and group
Directional balance GII-D -44.63 at directional coverage 100%. Magnitude is direction-neutral; a large benefit and a large burden both score high.
Causal method and counterfactual
Evidence level D; counterfactual compromised; attribution language "associated with".
Evidence and source vintages
No source manifest attached to this illustrative dossier.
Limitations and competing explanations
The headline is withheld; limitations dominate: weighted coverage 50% is below the provisional 70% threshold; counterfactual is compromised.
Forecast-versus-observed comparison
Observed stage; compare against any prior forecast vintage in the revision history.
Revision history
No corrections recorded; this is the first analytic version.
Downloads, API, methods, and citation
API: https://gii.apiautomations.com/api/v1/dossiers/GII-US-2020-JUD-SCOTUS-OPINION-0003-v1 · Methods: https://gii.apiautomations.com/methodology · Downloads: https://gii.apiautomations.com/releases. Cite: Sather, K. (2026). Decision dossier: Hypothetical Administrative Deference Ruling (GII-US-2020-JUD-SCOTUS-OPINION-0003-v1), Government Impact Index methodology v1.1.1. https://gii.apiautomations.com/dossiers/GII-US-2020-JUD-SCOTUS-OPINION-0003-v1. Internal — not for public distribution.
Revision history#
No corrections recorded; this is the first analytic version. Prior versions, once they exist, remain retrievable and visibly superseded.
Challenge this record#
Dispute the evidence or methodology of this dossier through the challenge portal. A structured challenge identifies the recordId, disputedClaim, evidence, requestedChange, submitterInterest and receives a tracking ID and a reasoned disposition.
Machine-readable at GET https://gii.apiautomations.com/api/v1/dossiers/GII-US-2020-JUD-SCOTUS-OPINION-0003-v1. Illustrative dossier on supplied inputs. GII-US is pre-pilot; no production scores exist for any real government decision.